virdevmapper: Handle kernel without device-mapper support

In one of my latest patch (v6.6.0~30) I was trying to remove
libdevmapper use in favor of our own implementation. However, the
code did not take into account that device mapper can be not
compiled into the kernel (e.g. be a separate module that's not
loaded) in which case /proc/devices won't have the device-mapper
major number and thus virDevMapperGetTargets() and/or
virIsDevMapperDevice() fails.

However, such failure is safe to ignore, because if device mapper
is missing then there can't be any multipath devices and thus we
don't need to allow the deps in CGroups, nor create them in the
domain private namespace, etc.

Fixes: 22494556542c676d1b9e7f1c1f2ea13ac17e1e3e
Reported-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
Tested-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
This commit is contained in:
Euler Robot 2020-08-18 11:04:24 +02:00 committed by Chen Qun
parent dac7e7ddd1
commit 2a0f1b2c7c

View File

@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
From 83298f3086380c9b3b3ec39a2d6bf7b33592683b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:04:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] virdevmapper: Handle kernel without device-mapper support
In one of my latest patch (v6.6.0~30) I was trying to remove
libdevmapper use in favor of our own implementation. However, the
code did not take into account that device mapper can be not
compiled into the kernel (e.g. be a separate module that's not
loaded) in which case /proc/devices won't have the device-mapper
major number and thus virDevMapperGetTargets() and/or
virIsDevMapperDevice() fails.
However, such failure is safe to ignore, because if device mapper
is missing then there can't be any multipath devices and thus we
don't need to allow the deps in CGroups, nor create them in the
domain private namespace, etc.
Fixes: 22494556542c676d1b9e7f1c1f2ea13ac17e1e3e
Reported-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
Tested-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
---
src/util/virdevmapper.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/util/virdevmapper.c b/src/util/virdevmapper.c
index b43dbefa9a..a81e2edee4 100644
--- a/src/util/virdevmapper.c
+++ b/src/util/virdevmapper.c
@@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ virDevMapperGetMajor(unsigned int *major)
VIR_AUTOSTRINGLIST lines = NULL;
size_t i;
+ if (!virFileExists(CONTROL_PATH))
+ return -2;
+
if (virFileReadAll(PROC_DEVICES, BUF_SIZE, &buf) < 0)
return -1;
@@ -126,8 +129,13 @@ virDMOpen(void)
memset(&dm, 0, sizeof(dm));
- if ((controlFD = open(CONTROL_PATH, O_RDWR)) < 0)
+ if ((controlFD = open(CONTROL_PATH, O_RDWR)) < 0) {
+ if (errno == ENOENT)
+ return -2;
+
+ virReportSystemError(errno, _("Unable to open %s"), CONTROL_PATH);
return -1;
+ }
if (!virDMIoctl(controlFD, DM_VERSION, &dm, &tmp)) {
virReportSystemError(errno, "%s",
@@ -300,8 +308,16 @@ virDevMapperGetTargets(const char *path,
* consist of devices or yet another targets. If that's the
* case, we have to stop recursion somewhere. */
- if ((controlFD = virDMOpen()) < 0)
+ if ((controlFD = virDMOpen()) < 0) {
+ if (controlFD == -2) {
+ /* The CONTROL_PATH doesn't exist. Probably the
+ * module isn't loaded, yet. Don't error out, just
+ * exit. */
+ return 0;
+ }
+
return -1;
+ }
return virDevMapperGetTargetsImpl(controlFD, path, devPaths, ttl);
}
--
2.27.0